W H A T  IS   D E V E L O P M E NT ?


    Since the mid sixties, “development” became the catch-word of United Nations’ economic and social programs. The New York based world organization proudly launched a “Decade of Development” to satisfy its Third-world swelling membership. Heads of State and ministers attending
the annual meetings in  Manhattan studded their speeches with references to the “problems of development”. Some even tried to define the question with a few words. The Pope said  that “development” was the new  “word” for “peace” or something along this line.Economists considered
impossible to squeeze all the elements involved in a simple formula; any understanding of the concept needed at least several paragraphs. I, for one, did not give up the search for a short  phrase…and came off with one .

    It was in the spring of 1969.I was accompanying my brother and his ministers to the region of Hamadan in Eastern Iran. Preparing the implementation of its decentralization plans, the government used to spend a few days every now and then in the provinces.The local authorities and representatives of the people would meet with the cabinet members and discuss their affairs.

    Decisions were taken on the spot and central development plans were accordingly modified.
I was glued to the plane’s window, watching the landscape below. Most of the country seemed to reproduce in all its parts one and the same model: an elevated  plateau surrounded by high mountains. Due to paucity of arable soil,farmers would pass beyond the easily accessible flat
lands and venture as far as possible on the abrupt slopes. While approaching the Hamadan region I noticed unusual freshly ploughed fields dotting  the terrain among pastures and cultivated or harvested areas. Their strange shape struck me:instead of the normal square or rectangle form they were elliptical! From above, they looked like the footsteps of some giant creature,escaped from the pages of a science-fiction story, sauntering around aimlessly.

    I showed them to the minister of agriculture who was unable to give an adequate explanation. Suddenly an idea popped in my mind. I asked the minister if he knew when mechanization had been introduced in the area. He consulted his files and it appeared that the first tractors had just been sent there. That was it! The answer to the conundrum . The riddle was solved.For centuries the Iranian peasant had learned, generation after generation, to skilfully use his plough and draw right angles on the soil. For centuries he had tilled square and rectangular fields. And now,he just had been taught to drive tractors. He couldn’t yet trace these geometrical figures with the new machines. He had to get adapted to them and  learn to use efficiently the new tools. This was a matter of time. Training programmes would certainly follow the introduction of new technologies… So, I developed in my mind a very short definition of development, a mathematical formula. I jotted down in my notebook:

    “Development is an ellipse between two rectangles”. And I thought to myself that importing technology is not enough: education is the key to development. 

    "What are you writing?” asked the minister of agriculture. "Nothing important…something I must tell  colleagues at the United Nations!”…
                                                                                                                                                     Fereydoun Hoveyda - 1970

Back to Links